Taylor and Francis Group is part of the Academic Publishing Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 3099067.

Informa

Further Reading

Click on the tabs below to view additional reading material for each section.

Secondary Research

  • Alaszewski, Andy. 2006. Using Diaries for Social Research. London: Sage (An introductory student guide for all social sciences, with some discussion of examples of diary research by historical anthropologists.)
  • Atkinson, Paul, and Martyn Hammersley. 2007 (1983). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. 3rd edition. London: Routledge (Though this downplays the importance of secondary research in ethnography, see ch. 6 ‘Documents and other artefacts, real and virtual’.)
  • Aveyard, Helen. 2007. Doing a Literature Review in Health and Social Care. Maidenhead: Open University Press (Note her strong arguments in favour of systematic and transparent literature reviewing, and against unsystematic ‘narrative’ approaches. These arguments are relevant to social science and should make us all consider what, if any, system there is to our reviews of literature, and whether our claims to generalise from our literature reviews are valid.)
  • Barnett-Page, Elaine, and James Thomas. 2009. ‘Methods for research synthesis: A critical review’, ESRC National Centre for Research Methods NCRM Working Paper Series Number (01/09) http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=188(Useful as an overview of different approaches to secondary research, but also because the authors practice what they preach by showing clearly how they conducted their review for this paper.)
  • Bell, Judith. 2005. Doing Your Research Project: A Guide for First-time Researchers in Education, Health and Social Science. Maidenhead: Open University Press (Simple guide for beginners, including chapters on preparation, information management, literature reviews, analysis of documentary evidence, diaries.)
  • Blaxter, L., C. Hughes and M. Tight. 2006. How to Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press (See especially ch. 4: ‘Reading for research’; ch.5 ‘Managing your project’; and the section in ch. 2 on ‘Keeping your research diary’; and the section in ch. 7 on ‘Ordered and chaotic data’.)
  • Boaz, Annette, with Adrienne Sidford. 2006. ‘Reviewing existing research’, in N. Gilbert (ed.) From Postgraduate to Social Scientist: A Guide to Key Skills. London: Sage, pp. 7–24 (Though making the common mistake of over-emphasising the importance of comprehensive coverage of ‘as much relevant literature as possible’ (p. 7), this gives useful guidance on approaching reviews systematically.)
  • Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (An ethnography of sociality and culture in the virtual world of Second Life and useful for those interested in the digital and the virtual world of the internet as objects of anthropological enquiry.)
  • Borgman, Christine L. 2007. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. Boston, MA: MIT Press (Not specifically on social science and certainly not a practical guide for students, but for those interested in the rapidly changing meaning of secondary research this offers a fascinating exploration of some of the more radical implications of the digital data deluge.)
  • Burton, D. 2000. ‘Using literature to support research’, in D. Burton (ed.), Research Training for Social Scientists: A Handbook for Postgraduate Researchers. London: Sage (Slightly dated on some search techniques, but most of this is simple no-nonsense guidance on the basics of secondary research.)
  • Calishain, Tara. 2007. Information Trapping: Real-Time Research on the Web. Berkeley, CA: New Riders Press (This outlines techniques for ongoing information-gathering in real time, as distinct from one-off searches. It offers far more sophisticated guidance on internet use than you are likely to need for a short-term research project, but a glance through this will quickly give you some useful tips and a sense of why it might be worth regularly strengthening your information capability throughout your life.)
  • Cooper, H.M. 1998. Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews. 3rd edition. Newbury Park, CA: Sage (A very useful guide, arguing strongly in favour applying similar rigour, transparency, and analytical techniques to secondary sources as are applied to primary research.)
  • Daniel, Ben Kei (ed.) 2011. Handbook of Research on Methods and Techniques for Studying Virtual Communities: Paradigms and Phenomena, Volume 1. New York: Hershey (Many of the 44 papers are highly technical and specialist, but there are several papers of general interest to social scientists considering web tools for researching online culture and sociality.)
  • Dochartaigh, N. 2007. Internet Research Skills: How To Do Your Literature Search and Find Research Information Online. 2nd edition. London: Sage (Good introductory textbook for social science students, with an intelligent balance between promotion of comprehensive and creative search skills and cautions about the need for critical evaluation of source quality.)
  • Fink, Arlene. 2005. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 3rd edition. London: Sage (Useful guidance on searching and synthesising, with helpful online examples mainly from social sciences.)
  • Friedman, Barbara G. 2004. Web Search Savvy: Strategies and Shortcuts for Online Research. Lawrence Erlbaum (Good basic generic guide on web searching, with sound guidance on search strategies, databases, and evaluation of sites.)
  • Gaiser, Ted, and Anthony E. Schreiner. 2009. A Guide to Conducting Online Research. London: Sage (Very comprehensive generic guide, including chapters on study design, ethics, various social media tools, analysis, and research presentation.)
  • Hannes, Karin, and Craig Lockwood. 2012. Synthesizing Qualitative Research: Choosing the Right Approach. London: Wiley-Blackwell (Though far more technical and systematic than most anthropologists would prefer, this is worth looking at to get a sense of how systematic approaches to secondary research have been developed in other social sciences.)
  • Heaton, Janet. 2005. Reworking Qualitative Data. London: Sage (Good introductory textbook with a wealth of sociological examples.)
  • Hewson, Claire, Peter Yule, Dianna Laurent, and Carl Vogel. 2003. Internet Research Methods: A Practical Guide for the Social and Behavioural Sciences. London: Sage (This includes coverage of a wide variety of internet sources, plus an introduction to internet-mediated primary research. Although already somewhat dated, this has useful generic advice and helpful websites.)
  • Hunsinger, Jeremy, Lisbeth Klastrup, and Matthew Allen (eds), 2010. International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer (Excellent collection of cutting-edge papers about how to use the internet and about internet social processes. Most papers are more useful as examples of primary rather than secondary internet research.)
  • Jacoby, JoAnn, and Josephine Kibbee (eds), 2007. Cultural Anthropology: A Guide to Reference and Internet Sources. 2nd edition.Westport, CN: Libraries Unlimited (Includes coverage of print and digital media in general social science, all major subfields and many popular themes of anthropology, plus guidance on search, writing, and conducting research.)
  • Jupp, Victor (ed.) 2006. The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. London: Sage (See entries on ‘meta-analysis’, ‘internet research’, ‘literature review’ and ‘secondary analysis’.)
  • Levene, Marc .2010. An Introduction to Search Engines and Web Navigation. 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley (This gives far more technical and detailed analysis than most social researchers will want, but there is useful social research guidance in sections on social network analysis, peer-to-peer networking, and other social web phenomena.)
  • Littell, J.H., P. Corcoran and V. Pillai. 2008. Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (Especially ch. 5 ‘Reviewing the literature’.)
  • Macdonald, Keith. 2001. ‘Using documents’, in N. Gilbert (ed.) Researching Social Life. 2nd edition. London: Sage, pp. 194–210 (Good systematic coverage of a wide range of public and private document types, and of ways to assess credibility and representativeness.)
  • Machi, Lawrence A., and Brenda T. McEvoy. 2009. The Literature Review: Six Steps to Success. London: Sage (Clear introductory guide targeted at postgraduates.)
  • Petticrew, Mark, and Helen Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford: Blackwell (Provides very clear justification for systematic approaches to research reviews, with excellent use of simple examples of how even high-profile scientists make bogus claims on the basis of haphazard reviews. The authors also explore some of the critiques of systematic approaches.)
  • Reardon, Denis. 2006. Doing Your Undergraduate Project. London: Sage (See ch. 8 ‘The literature review’.)
  • Ridley, Diana. 2008. The Literature Review: A Step-by-Step Guide for Students. London: Sage (Aimed mainly at postgraduates, this offers simple guidance on reading, search, analysis and writing.)
  • Sandelowski, Margarete, and Julie Barroso. 2007. Handbook for Synthesizing Qualitative Research. New York: Springer (Though primarily addressed at health sector students this is a superb introduction to the basics of qualitative secondary research analysis in social science.)
  • Slavin, Robert E. 1996. ‘Best-evidence synthesis: An intelligent alternative to meta-analysis’, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 48(1): 9–18 (A clear argument advocating systematic and transparent literature evaluation and review.)
  • Smith, Emma. 2008. Using Secondary Data in Educational and Social Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press (Includes well-balanced discussions of critical approaches to assessing the reliability of both ethnographic and quantified information in a wide variety of fields.)
  • Spink, Amanda, and Michael Zimmer (eds), 2008. Web Search: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer (Although most articles here will mainly be of interest to specialist researchers on the socio-political processes relating to the internet, several are also worth reading for their strong insistence on critical approaches to the use of web search engines.)
  • Tate, Marsha Ann. 2010. Web Wisdom: How To Evaluate and Create Information Quality on the Web. 2nd edition. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press (Very useful guidance on ways of critically evaluating information quality and assessing biases in a wide range of web sources. See also companion website: http://mtateresearch.com/web_wisdom/)
  • Thomas, R. Murray, and Dale L. Brubaker. 2001. Avoiding Thesis and Dissertation Pitfalls: 61 Cases of Problems and Solutions. Boston, MA: Praeger (Useful, but now superseded by better texts with more up-to-date guidance on web searching. See Chapter 3: ‘Searching the professional literature’.)
  • Tomaiuolo, Nicholas G. 2009 (2004) The Web Library: Building a World Class Personal Library with Free Web Resources. Medford, NJ: Information Today (Updated at http://web.ccsu.edu/library/tomaiuolon/theweblibrary.htm; superb collection of advice on free resources for online scholarship.)
  • University of Essex, Department of Sociology ESRC Qualitative Data Archival Resource Centre (QUALIDATA) http://www.essex.ac.uk/qualidata  (Though still rather limited in scope, this is a nice example of a national initiative to promote sharing and re-analysing of qualitative social research information.)
  • Vartanian, Thomas P. 2011. Secondary Data Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press (Mainly focused on large survey-based highly quantified information sources.)
  • Virtual Training Suite. 2011. ‘Internet for social research methods’ (online tutorial) www.vtstutorials.co.uk/tutorial/socialresearchmethods
  • Weeks, John M. 1998. Introduction to Library Research in Anthropology. 2nd edition. Boulder, CO: Westview Press (Dated in some ways, but most of the suggestions and information remain valid.)
  • Wilkinson, D. 2005. The Essential Guide to Postgraduate Study. London: Sage (See ch. 6: ‘Reading and searching for information and seeking advice’.)
  • Valles, Miguel S., Louise Corti, Maria Tamboukou, and Alejandro Baer. 2011. ‘Qualitative archives and biographical research methods. An introduction to the FQS Special Issue’, Forum: Qualitative Research http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110381  (Introduction to a collection of papers on specific themes in European development of secondary use of qualitative research.)