Early State Constitutions Most of the former colonies adopted state constitutions during the early days of the Revolution. Americans’ long experience with written charters of government made any other political arrangement almost unthinkable. Rhode Island continued to be governed by its royal charter (with references to Britain deleted) until 1842, when the state drafted a constitution in the wake of the Dorr Rebellion. Power was shared by state executive, legislative, and judicial departments, but the elected legislatures wielded most of the power in day-to-day governance. All state constitutions contained provisions establishing property qualifications for suffrage, so the vast majority of people were disfranchised. Yet all state constitutions also contained bills of rights that anticipated many of the liberties subsequently enshrined in the national Bill of Rights.
Rhode Island Royal Charter of 1663 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/ri04.asp
New Hampshire Constitution (January 5, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/nh-1776.htm
Georgia Constitution (February 5, 1777) http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ga02.asp
South Carolina Constitution (March 26, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/sc-1776.htm
Virginia Constitution (June 29, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/va-1776.htm
New Jersey Constitution (July 2, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/nj-1776.htm
Delaware Constitution (September 10, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/del-1776.htm
Pennsylvania Constitution (September 28, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/pa-1776.htm
Maryland Constitution (November 11, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/md-1776.htm
North Carolina Constitution (December 18, 1776) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/nc-1776.htm
New York Constitution (April 20, 1777) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/ny-1777.htm
South Carolina Constitution (March 19, 1778) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/sc-1778.htm
Massachusetts Constitution (1780) http://www.nhinet.org/ccs/docs/ma-1780.htm
Articles of Confederation The Articles of Confederation, approved by the Second Continental Congress in 1777 and ratified by the states in 1781, established the first de jurenational government of the United States of America. The union was organized on the principle of the sovereign equality of all states and established a national government administered by the Congress of the Confederation. Article XIII anticipated the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution of 1787, declaring that “the Articles of this Confederation shall be inviolably observed by every state, and the union shall be perpetual.” It constituted for the first time a federal union that has endured down to the present.
Draft Articles of Confederation (July 12, 1776) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/constitution.htm
Elliot’s Debates on the Articles of Confederation (Thomas Jefferson’s notes on the ratification debates begin at p. 70) http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=lled&fileName=001/lled001.db&recNum=82
Text of the Articles of Confederation http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/artconf.asp
Photographic Images of the Articles of Confederation http://www.archives.gov/historical-docs/document.html?doc=2&title.raw=Articles%20of%20Confederation
Calls for Abolition, 1773–1783 (Primary Sources) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/rebellion/text6/slaveryrights.pdf
Original Design of the Great Seal of the United States (Image) http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc_large_image.php?flash=true&doc=5
Treaty of Paris The greatest achievement of the Confederation government was the negotiation and conclusion of the Treaty of Paris, which ended the Revolutionary War in 1783. Under the treaty Britain ceded to the United States not only the land within the boundaries of the original colonies, but also all the territory between the Allegheny Mountains and the Mississippi River. This set the stage for a westward expansion that eventually led settlers to the shores of the Pacific. The treaty also provided for the compensation of Loyalists for property confiscated from them during the war, an issue that led to much public debate. Alexander Hamilton himself represented a number of former Loyalists in their claims under the Treaty of Paris against the newly independent government.
Historical Background on the Treaty of Paris http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=6
Text of the Treaty of Paris http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris763.asp
Photographic Images of the Treaty of Paris http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc_large_image.php?doc=6
A Pamphlet War on the Postwar Treatment of Loyalists (Excerpts) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/independence/text4/hamiltonledyard.pdf
Alexander Hamilton’s Letters from Phocion http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/phocion-letters/
Territorial Ordinances The Confederation government passed two measures providing for the administration of the newly acquired national territories. The Land Ordinance of 1785 dealt with the division and disposition of the western territories. The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 dealt with political arrangements in the territories north and west of the Ohio River.
Land Ordinance of 1785 http://research.archives.gov/description/1943531
Northwest Ordinance http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=8&page=transcript
Shays’s Rebellion The fragile authority of the Confederation government was tested in 1786 when rebellion broke out in Massachusetts. When the Massachusetts government refused to pass debt amelioration measures, debtors rose up under the leadership of Daniel Shays, a former captain in the Continental Army. From Paris, Thomas Jefferson wrote of the rebellion, “I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical.” It was the sort of thing he could write from an ocean away. In the young nation, the rebellion shook confidence in the national government and inspired calls for reform.
Biographical Sketch of Daniel Shays http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/person.do?shortName=daniel_shays
Biographical Sketch of Job Shattuck http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/person.do?shortName=job_shattuck
Engraving, “The Sons of Coke and Littleton” (1787) http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/artifact.do?shortName=concordcourt_bickerstaff
Letter from Daniel Shays to General Shepard Regarding Funeral Rites for the Fallen (1787) http://shaysrebellion.stcc.edu/shaysapp/artifact.do?shortName=gazette_ds114feb87
Proclamation Offering Amnesty to Rebels (June 15, 1787) http://www.memorialhall.mass.edu/collection/itempage.jsp?itemid=16484&img=0&level=advanced&transcription=1
Letter by Thomas Jefferson to James Madison on Shays’s Rebellion (January 30, 1787) http://www.earlyamerica.com/review/summer/letter.html
Failures of the Confederation Government With its limited mandate for governance and its inability to raise sufficient revenue, the Confederation government found itself embarrassed in its foreign affairs and frustrated at home. In 1786, delegates of five states met at Annapolis to discuss reform. The Annapolis Convention called upon the states to send delegates to a gathering to be held in Philadelphia the following year for the purpose of proposing constitutional changes. As George Washington wrote to James Madison shortly after the Annapolis Convention adjourned, “Thirteen Sovereignties pulling against each other, and all tugging at the fœderal head, will soon bring ruin on the whole; whereas a liberal, and energetic Constitution, well guarded & closely watched, to prevent incroachments, might restore us to that degree of respectability & consequence, to which we had a fair claim, & the brightest prospect of attaining.”
Founders on the Defects of the Articles of Confederation, 1780–1787 (Excerpts) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/text1/foundersdefectsarticlesconf.pdf
Proceedings of the Annapolis Convention http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch6s2.html
Letter of George Washington to James Madison (November 5, 1786)
http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?ammem/mgw:@field(DOCID+@lit(gw290030))
James Madison, Vices of the Political System of the United States (April 1787) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/text1/madisonvices.pdf
The Philadelphia Convention On February 21, 1787, Congress approved a convention of delegates “appointed by the several states be held at Philadelphia for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation and reporting to Congress and the several legislatures such alterations and provisions therein as shall when agreed to in Congress and confirmed by the states render the federal constitution adequate to the exigencies of Government & the preservation of the Union.” All present at the Convention agreed that change was needed. The question was only one of degree. Some favored shifting the center of political authority from the states to a strong national government, whereas others favored keeping the states the central units of political power. Two plans were circulated early on. The Virginia Plan, drafted by James Madison and presented by the Virginia delegation, proposed the creation of a strong national government. The New Jersey Plan, presented by William Paterson of New Jersey, proposed a federal government in which all states were equally represented and thereby protected the interests of the smaller states. Both plans took for granted that the only way forward was to abandon the Articles of Confederation, which clearly exceeded the authority granted by Congress in approving the Convention. The Connecticut Compromise, presented by Roger Sherman of Connecticut, struck a balance between the interests of large states and small states. It called for a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in one house of congress and equal representation in the other.
Report of Proceedings in Congress (February 21, 1787) http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/const04.asp
List of Delegates to the Constitutional Convention with Links to Biographies http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_founding_fathers.html
On Creating the U.S. Constitution: Commentary of Delegates & Observers, May–November 1787 (Excerpts) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/text2/constitutionalconvention.pdf
Farrand’s The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwfr.html
Links to Month-by-Month Accounts of the Progress of the Convention http://avalon.law.yale.edu/subject_menus/debcont.asp
Variant Drafts of the Virginia Plan http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/patexta.asp
Photographic Images of the Virginia Plan http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc_large_image.php?doc=7
Variant Drafts of the New Jersey Plan http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/patexta.asp
Photographic Image of a Draft of the New Jersey Plan [LINK DOES NOT GO TO IMAGE] http://myloc.gov/Exhibitions/creatingtheus/Constitution/Ratification/ExhibitObjects/TheNewJerseyPlan.aspx
Background on the Connecticut Compromise http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/minute/A_Great_Compromise.htm
Presentation of the Connecticut Compromise to the Constitutional Convention http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/debates_705.asp
Slavery and the Constitution The status of slaves and slavery under the Constitution was the subject of substantial debate at the Philadelphia Convention. The delegates from the southern states favored counting slaves for purposes of representation in Congress, while antislavery delegates feared that this would give slave states a political incentive to continue and expand the institution of slavery. The hypocrisy of treating slaves as chattel property under state slave codes but as free citizens for the purpose of national representation was not lost on antislavery delegates. The controversy was resolved by the notorious Three-Fifths Compromise under which a slave counted as three-fifths of a free person for purposes of state representation. The Constitution also included a provision barring Congress from prohibiting the slave trade until 1808, thereby ensuring a steady supply of African slaves for the near future.
James Madison’s Notes on the Debates on Slavery at the Constitutional Convention:
The Final Draft When the final draft of the Constitution was presented to the Confederation Congress on September 20, 1786, many were shocked that the Convention had so far exceeded its mandate. The Congress was unable to do anything about it, however, because the document had been drafted by the most esteemed leaders of that generation, indeed, the most esteemed leaders of any generation. So the draft was sent to the several states for ratification by state constitutional conventions.
Essay: “A More Perfect Union: The Creation of the U.S. Constitution” http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_history.html
The Constitution of the United States http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html
The Debate on Ratification Debate over ratification was heated, with Federalists pitted against Antifederalists. The Federalists, led by John Jay, Alexander Hamilton, and James Madison, argued that the proposed constitution would enable the fledgling nation to protect its interests both at home and abroad while ensuring a strong and vital union for the benefit of posterity. Antifederalists argued that the proposed government would swallow up the states and, with its glaring omission of a bill of rights, pave the way for abuses of power. Much of the debate took place in the popular press.
Text of the Federalist Papers (Organized Individually) http://thomas.loc.gov/home/histdox/fedpapers.html
Chronology of the Pro- and Antifederalist Papers (with Links to the Full Text of Each) http://www.constitution.org/afp/afpchron.htm
Antifederalists’ Letters to Newspapers During the Constitution Ratification Debates, 1787–1788 (Excerpts) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/text4/antifednewspapers.pdf
Ratification of the Constitution On December 7, 1787, Delaware became the first state to ratify the Constitution. As more states ratified, the Constitution gained momentum; but Virginia, Massachusetts, and New York became battlegrounds for ratification. The fate of the proposed union depended on the support of these large and influential states. All three eventually ratified: Virginia by a margin of five votes and New York by a margin of three. After initially rejecting the new Constitution, Rhode Island was the last state to ratify in 1790.
Appeals for Calm in the Ratification Debates, 1787–1788 (Excerpts) http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/makingrev/constitution/text4/coolheads.pdf
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Delaware, December 7, 1787 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratde.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Pennsylvania, December 12, 1787 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratpa.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New Jersey, December 18, 1787 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratnj.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Georgia, January 2, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratga.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Connecticut, January 8, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratct.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Massachusetts, February 6, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratma.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Maryland, April 28, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratme.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of South Carolina, May 23, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratsc.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New Hampshire, June 21, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratnh.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Virginia, June 26, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratva.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York, July 26, 1788 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratny.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of North Carolina, November 21, 1789 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratnc.asp
Ratification of the Constitution by the State of Rhode Island, May 29, 1790 http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/ratri.asp