The Great Depression
Although the causes of the Great Depression are subject to much academic debate, there is no question that the Depression was one of the most serious domestic crises in U.S. history. Every sector of the economy was impacted, from agriculture to manufacture. The contraction of the economy left one-quarter of the American workforce unemployed, while the standard of living dropped for those who remained employed. Shantytowns—dubbed Hoovervilles for the president upon whom many blamed the Depression—sprang up across the nation, populated by homeless families no longer able to pay for shelter.
Timeline of the Great Depression http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/timeline/rails-timeline/
Newspaper Excerpts: The Stock Market Crash of 1929 http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/primary-resources/crash-headlines/
Online Library of Primary Sources: Great Depression and World War II, 1929–1945 http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/depwwii/
Online Exhibit: Photographing the People of the Depression http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/depwwii/art/people.html
Article: “What Can We Learn from the Great Depression?”http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/11/economic-history-0?zid=316&ah=2f6fb672faf113fdd3b11cd1b1bf8a77
Twentieth Amendment
Until the ratification of the Twentieth Amendment in 1933, the outgoing president spent four months in office before the inauguration of the new chief executive. The Lame Duck Amendment, as it was called, provided that the new Congress would convene on January 3 and that the president and vice president would take office on January 20.
Senate Judiciary Report on the Twentieth Amendment http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-2002/pdf/GPO-CONAN-2002-9-21.pdf
The Constitution and the Inauguration of the President http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/inaugurationconstit.html
Twentieth Amendment (Annotated) http://www.law.cornell.edu/anncon/html/amdt20_user.html
Roosevelt Takes Charge
The Republican party was repudiated at the polls in the 1932 presidential election. Franklin Delano Roosevelt won a landslide victory by promising the nation a New Deal that would restore the American economy to prosperity. In his inaugural address, Roosevelt committed his administration to programs of unprecedented governmental intervention to pull the nation from the grips of the Depression. “This nation asks for action,” he said, “and action now. Our greatest primary task is to put people to work. This is no unsolvable problem if we face it wisely and courageously. It can be accomplished in part by direct recruiting by the Government itself, treating the task as we would treat the emergency of a war, but at the same time, through this employment, accomplishing greatly needed projects to stimulate and reorganize the use of our natural resources.”
Franklin Delano Roosevelt http://millercenter.org/president/fdroosevelt
1933 News Reel: Roosevelt’s Inauguration http://www.learnnc.org/lp/editions/nchist-worldwar/5817
First Inaugural Address of Franklin Delano Roosevelt (March 4, 1933) http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/3280
Saving the Banks
A banking crisis swept the nation as businesses and homeowners defaulted on their debts and Americans, fearing bank closures, withdrew their deposits. By March of 1933, nearly every state had passed measures suspending or limiting ordinary banking activities. One of Roosevelt’s first actions as president was to issue a series of executive orders, subsequently enacted into law by Congress, to stabilize the banking system.
Fireside Chat on the Banking Crisis (March 12, 1933)—Full Text http://millercenter.org/president/speeches/detail/3298
Fireside Chat 1: “On the Banking Crisis” (March 12, 1933)—Audio Excerpt http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9CBpbuV3ok
Emergency Banking Act of 1933 http://www.fame.org/pdf/emergency%20banking%20act%20of%201933.pdf
Executive Order 6102: Requiring Gold Coin, Gold Bullion, and Gold Certificates to Be Delivered to the Government (April 5, 1933) http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=14611
Recovery Measures
In the first three months of Roosevelt’s presidency, Congress enacted legislation providing the bare minimum of relief needed to prevent widespread social upheaval. The traditional assumptions of American life seemed to have failed, and Roosevelt sought to restore confidence to the nation. The Agricultural Adjustment Act and the National Industrial Recovery Act raised income levels in agriculture and industry. The Tennessee Valley Authority promoted economic development in some of the most depressed areas of the country, and the Civilian Conservation Corps and Public Works Administration created jobs conserving and developing the public infrastructure.
Online Exhibit: America’s Great Depression and Roosevelt’s New Deal http://dp.la/exhibitions/exhibits/show/new-deal
Agricultural Adjustment Act (1933) http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/farmbills/1933.pdf
National Industrial Recovery Act (1933) http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=66
Tennessee Valley Authority Act (1933) http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?doc=65
Tennessee Valley Authority http://www.tva.com/abouttva/history.htm
Federal Emergency Relief Act (1935) http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=2282&chapter=216441&layout=html&Itemid=27
Essay: The Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA) http://content.lib.washington.edu/feraweb/essay.html
The New Deal Network (includes library of primary sources organized by topic) http://newdeal.feri.org/index.htm
The Second New Deal
In 1935 Roosevelt implemented a second wave of New Deal programs focusing on social and economic reform. The Works Progress Administration put millions of workers on the government payroll with projects ranging from public works to cultural programs. The National Youth Administration employed people between the ages of 16 and 25. The National Labor Relations Act created a board to deal with labor grievances and settle strikes. Measures such as wage-and-hour legislation and the Social Security Act of 1935 provided direct relief to the aged and unemployed.
Slideshow: FDR, the WPA, and the New Deal Arts Programs http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/pdfs/ppDIRwpa.pdf
Online Collection: Posters from the WPA http://lcweb2.loc.gov/ammem/wpaposters/about.html
“America’s Unfinished Business,” Address of Florence S. Kerr, Assistant Administrator of the Works Progress Administration (May 6, 1939) http://newdeal.feri.org/works/wpa04.htm
National Youth Administration http://www.gwu.edu/~erpapers/teachinger/glossary/nya.cfm
National Labor Relations Act (1935) http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=67
FDR and Housing Legislation http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/aboutfdr/housing.html
State Recovery Measures
In Home Building Association v. Blaisdell (1934) the Supreme Court narrowly upheld state legislation protecting debtors from foreclosure as a valid exercise of state police powers. The dissenting justices viewed such laws as clear violations of the Contract Clause of the Constitution.
Home Building Association v. Blaisdell (1934) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1933/1933_370
Public Interest Doctrine Abandoned
Starting with Nebbia v. New York (1934), the Supreme Court abandoned the public interest doctrine limiting public regulation, thus paving the way for state regulation of virtually any business so long as the measures reasonably promoted the general welfare .
Nebbia v. New York (1934) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/291/502/case.html
Gold Clause Cases
Some of the New Deal emergency measures involved monetary policy, specifically, the cancellation of contract clauses calling for the payment of debts in gold. In what came to be known as the Gold Clause Cases, the Supreme Court narrowly upheld the cancellation of such provisions as a valid exercise of Congress’s power over the monetary system. The cases represented a major victory for New Deal’s recovery program.
Norman v. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company (1935) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/240/case.html
Nortz v. United States (1935) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/294/317
Perry v. United States (1935) http://newdeal.feri.org/court/294US330.htm
New Deal Setbacks
While the Supreme Court upheld the New Deal on monetary policy, its regulatory programs did not fare as well. Legislation creating retirement benefits for interstate railroad employees, measures protecting farmers from foreclosure, and laws regulating wages and hours were overturned as violations of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Commerce Clause. In addition, the authority of the president to remove members of federal regulatory commissions was held to violate the constitutional separation of powers.
Panama Refining Company v. Ryan (1935) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/293/388/case.html
Retirement Board v. Alton Railroad Company (1935) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/295/330
Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank Company v. Radford (1935) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/295/555/case.html
Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/295/602/case.html
Myers v. United States (1926) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/272/52/case.html
Schechter Poultry Corporation v. United States (1935) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1934/1934_854
Roosevelt and the Court
Roosevelt made no attempt to conceal his frustration with the Court. In a press conference of May 31, 1935, he likened the Schechter Poultry decision to the Dred Scott case in its historical import and accused the Court of being out of touch with the needs of the nation. When the Court struck down even more recovery measures the following year, many New Dealers urged the president to take action.
FDR Press Conference (May 31, 1935) http://newdeal.feri.org/court/fdr5_31_35.htm
United States v. Butler (1936) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1935/1935_401
Carter v. Carter Coal Company (1936) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/298/238/case.html
Ashton v. Cameron County Water District (1936) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/298/513/case.html
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority (1936) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/297/288/case.html
Morehead v. New York ex rel. Tipaldo (1936) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/298/587
Roosevelt’s Court Plan
Democratic victory in the 1936 elections prompted Roosevelt to take action against judicial opposition to the New Deal program. In February of 1937 Roosevelt presented Congress with a plan for the reorganization of the federal judiciary. The proposal included appointing additional judges at every level of the judiciary to counter the influence of older judges thought to be out of touch with the needs of the nation. The proposal backfired badly and was rejected as an attack on the independence of the judiciary. Its defeat had far-reaching consequences in shoring up congressional opposition to other New Deal proposals.
Statement by Frank E. Gannett on Roosevelt’s Court Packing Plan (February 23, 1937) http://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/separation-powers/images/gannett-letter.jpg
President Roosevelt’s Fireside Chat on “Court-Packing” (March 9, 1937) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUBH1dygxyE
Article: “When Franklin Roosevelt Clashed with the Supreme Court—andLost,” by William E. Leuchtenburg http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/showdown.html
West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish (1937) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/300/379
National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation (1937) http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1936/1936_419’
National Labor Relations Board v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Company (1937) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/301/58
Steward Machine Company v. Davis (1937) http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/301/548/case.html
Helvering v. Davis (1937) http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/301/619